Trusts, probate and estates: contentious

We have long been regarded as a leading chambers in the fields of trusts, wills and probate disputes, with our reputation for excellence reinforced by constant recommendations in legal directories.

Our barristers not only have outstanding intellectual ability but also commercial acumen and sensitivity to the needs of clients, with a commitment to providing an excellent quality of service.

Areas of expertise include:

  • The scope of trustees’ powers and duties
  • Construction and rectification of trust documents
  • Probate disputes, including issues of construction and rectification of wills and testamentary capacity
  • Administration of estates, including cross-border issues
  • Claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
  • Trusts in a commercial context, including employee benefit trusts and Quistclose trusts
  • International trust and estates disputes, including conflicts of law issues
  • Trust issues in matrimonial proceedings
  • Charitable trusts
  • Advising on and attending applications to the Court of Protection – experience includes but not limited to, acting for Protected Person (via Official Solicitor or litigation friend), interested parties and the Deputy
  • Professional negligence in trust and estates matters
  • Art and cultural property law (more information here)

Our barristers have a wealth of shared knowledge and experience. We are trusted and valued for our skills and know-how in the private client field. Our annual Wilberforce Trust Litigation Conference is a firm fixture for leading private client practitioners, providing a forum in which we can examine and discuss recent trends and developments with our clients.

We are regularly instructed by accountants, banks and financial institutions, as well as solicitors, attorneys and advocates. We are experienced in handling international work in offshore jurisdictions including Jersey, Guernsey, the Isle of Man, Bermuda, the Bahamas, the Cayman Islands, the British Virgin Islands, the Turks and Caicos Islands, Gibraltar, Hong Kong and Singapore.

Rankings and recognition

Wilberforce is ranked as a tier 1 set in Chambers & Partners and The Legal 500 for Traditional Chancery and Private Client (Trusts & Probate) work.

Chambers & Partners 2025: Wilberforce Chambers has an impressive group of barristers who handle complex disputes surrounding trusts and estates, and demonstrate multi-jurisdictional knowledge of the law. “Undoubtedly a leading chambers for complex trusts issues, it is very strong across the board and has great people from baby juniors to leading silks”, comments a source. Members of the set appeared in a number of significant matters of late, including Byers v Saudi National Bank, a Supreme Court knowing receipt constructive trust case. Other matters undertaken include National Westminster Bank plc v Ludlow Trustees Ltd and Coutts & Co v Ludlow Trust Co Ltd, a case concerning the largest ever transfer of trusteeships, from NatWest, RBS and Coutts to a new trustee company. As one interviewee said: “All the counsel here handle matters with ease, and provide prompt and practical advice. The set offers expertise in all relevant areas and can assist with the most complex, multi-faceted disputes.

Legal 500 2025: Wilberforce Chambers has ‘an unrivalled team of senior and junior counsel to provide the appropriate level of expert assistance with the various complex and sophisticated aspects of the matter’. Gilead Cooper KC is highly regarded for his excellent track record in handling contentious property and trust matters and is noted for his ’ability to produce clear opinions’. Brian Green KC successfully represented the Saudi National Bank before the Supreme Court in Byers v Saudi National Bank, a constructive trust dispute involving the issue of whether a continuing proprietary interest is a condition of bringing a claim in knowing receipt. Robert Ham KC is known for ‘giving excellent advice to clients and turning matters around quickly and effectively’ and has longstanding experience of handling contentious and non-contentious trusts and private client law matters. Simon Atkinson recently successfully acted for the defendant in Asturion Fondation v HRH Aljawharah Bint Ibrahim Abdulaziz Alibrahi, a complex case involving Liechtenstein, English and Sharia Law, a dispute over who is entitled to a high-value property in Hampstead.

Chambers Bar Awards 2023: Wilberforce wins Chancery Set of the Year

The Legal 500 Bar Awards 2022: Wilberforce wins Chancery Set of the Year

Chambers Bar Awards 2022: Clare Stanley KC wins Chancery Silk of the Year

Chambers Bar Awards 2021: Thomas Grant KC wins Chancery Silk of the Year

Chambers High Net Worth Awards 2020: Wilberforce wins of Set of the Year

The Legal 500 Bar Awards 2020: Wilberforce wins Private Client Set of the Year

Chambers Bar Awards 2018: Wilberforce wins Chancery Set of the Year

Wilberforce Chambers publishes a regular Private Client eBriefing update – if you would like to be added to the mailing list, please email marketing@wilberforce.co.uk.

Notable cases

Blower v GH Canfields LLP [2024]

[2024] EWHC 2763 (Ch)

His Honour Judge Paul Matthews KC found that the defendant firm had at all times provided the correct advice regarding the strength of the claims which the claimant had been facing, noting that the set-off now claimed could not have operated on the facts in any event, nor could the trust interests have operated as the claimant submitted at trial. The Court also found that the claimant had failed to set-off her case on causation in the pleadings – simply stating what she would not have done, but then not setting out what she would have done or what would have happened (the claimant expressly rejecting the application of the loss of a chance doctrine).

Read the full judgment

China Life Trustees v China Energy Reserve and Chemicals Group [2024]

[2024] HKCFA 15

This was the first case before the HKCFA to consider the important and much debated practical question of the test for whether a Quistclose trust exists.

The decision sets out a clear test and guidance that will be important in future cases, along the way dealt with the recent Privy Council decision in Prickly Bay Waterside Ltd, and explains when such trusts can arise in the absence of express restrictions on the purpose for which the funds can be used by the recipient.

Read the full judgment

Watts v Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs [2024]

[2024] UKUT 00168 (TCC)

The Upper Tribunal upheld the First-tier Tribunal’s finding that on a purposive construction of the relevant legislation (paragraph 14A(3) of Schedule 13 to the Finance Act 1996), the statutory language was to be interpreted more broadly than the Appellant contended for, and, therefore, on the facts of the case, the “transfer” in question comprised the aggregate of two amounts including, significantly, a payment made for the assignment of the option (as contended for by the Respondents) rather than just one amount (as contended for by the Appellant).

Read the full judgment

Hinduja v Hinduja (Court of Protection) [ongoing]

Acting for the Deputy for the head of the Hinduja family (one of the wealthiest families in the world) amidst complex disputes between separate branches of the family in various jurisdictions.

Asturion Fondation v Alibrahim [2023]

[2023] EWHC 3305 (Ch)

The case, one of The Lawyer’s Top 20 Cases of 2023, concerns a multimillion-pound property on The Bishop’s Avenue (sometimes known as “Billionaire’s Row”) in North London.

The judgment, in addition to dealing with questions of Liechtenstein, Swiss and Shari’a Law, addresses a number of principles of English property and trusts law and conflicts of laws.

Read the full judgment

Byers v Saudi National Bank [2023]

[2023] UKSC 51

Acting for the successful respondent before the Supreme Court in the now leading knowing receipt case of Byers v Saudi National Bank [2023] UKSC 51. The Supreme Court has now definitively stated the proprietary basis of such relief, and rejected the submission that it is a remedial response to unconscionability.

Read the full judgment

In the matter of the X Trusts [2023]

[2023] CA (Bda) 4 Civ

Successfully acting for the respondent in Bermuda Court of Appeal in a decision on breadth of standard form consent powers of fiduciary protectors of trusts. The Court reached a unanimous decision following full argument that the role of a fiduciary protector having a power of consent in relation to the exercise of trustee powers is “narrow” rather than “wide”.

Read the full judgment

Equity Trust (Jersey) Ltd v Halabi [2022]

[2022] UKPC 36

A key Privy Council decision of significance throughout the common law world, concerning the interplay between trusts and insolvency law. It has particular importance in circumstances where the trust fund is ‘insolvent’, in the sense that the trust assets are insufficient to meet the amounts due under the trustee’s right of indemnity.

Read the full judgment

Punter Southall Governance Services Ltd v Benge [2022]

[2022] EWHC 193 (Ch)

Concerns the circumstances in which the Court might refuse to bless a decision of pension scheme trustees, with particular reference to the meaning of “necessaries of life”, the conflicted position of member-trustees, and the relevance of disputed matters of fact.

Read the full judgment

Goodrich v AB [2022]

[2022] EWHC 81 (Ch)

An important decision concerning the construction of settlements created prior to the Human Rights Act 1998, the Civil Partnership Act 2004 and the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013.

Read the full judgment

 

Financial Services Compensation Scheme Ltd and others v Estera Corporate Trustees (Guernsey) Ltd [2020]

A high-value trusts dispute arising from the insolvency of the Freedom Bay property development scheme in St Lucia. The case raises important legal questions about trustees’ ability to rely on investors’ contributory negligence as a defence.

 

 

Spitalfields Open Space v The Governing Body of Christ Church Primary School and Others [2019]

In the wake of the multi-million pound restoration of Hawksmoor’s masterpiece, there was a long-running legal dispute over the consecrated churchyard which forms the setting to the Church, a World Heritage Site.

 

Children’s Investment Fund Foundation v HM Attorney General [2018]

Heard in the Court of Appeal, this case concerns a registered charity, which sought approval of making a grant of $360m to a new charity established by one of its trustees. It marks the first time that the question of duties owed by members of a charitable company has been considered by the courts, and has significant implications for members of charitable companies.

British Airways plc v Airways Pension Scheme Trustees Ltd [2018]

[2018] EWCA Civ 1533

Widely regarded as one of the most important in the pensions industry. It relates to the exercise discretionary powers and the proper purposes for which those powers can be exercised by trustees.

Read the full judgment

Akers v Samba [2017]

[2017] UKSC 6

A successful appeal to the Supreme Court on the application of section 127 Insolvency Act 1986 and the Recognition of Trusts Act 1987 to a disposition of legal title to Saudi shares held under a Cayman Islands trust.

Read the full judgment

 

Labrouche v Frey & Ors [2016]

[2016] EWHC 268 (Ch)

A long-running claim for breach of trust, which principally concerns the relationship between an English Will trust of a Swiss resident and a Liechtenstein Establishment and issues regarding remuneration of the trustees.

Read the full judgment

Futter v HMRC and Pitt v Holt

[2011] EWCA Civ 197

The seminal Supreme Court decision on what had become known as the rule in Re Hastings-Bass and on the ability to set aside voluntary dispositions on the ground of mistake.

Read the full judgment

Day v RCM

Linked appeals concerning an enduring power of attorney, inter vivos gifts of chattels and the rule in Strong v Bird.

Marley v Rawlings

[2014] UKSC 2

The Supreme Court decision on the construction and rectification of wills.

Read the full judgment

Rawstron v Freud

[2014] UKSC 2

Whether the will of Lucian Freud created a fully secret trust.

Read the full judgment

P L Travers Will Trust Trustees v HMRC

[2013] UKFTT 436 (TC)

Whether the royalties from the Mary Poppins stage musical were income or capital receipts for trust law purposes, and their correct tax treatment.

Read the full judgment

 

CIR v Nice Cheer Investments

A Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal case on whether unrealised profits of a trader in investments were liable to profits tax.

MHI v Cayman Island Tax Information Authority

Representing companies in a judicial review which established the obligations of Revenue Authorities seeking to enforce Tax Information Exchange provisions under the OECD model or double taxation treaties.

Insights View all thought leadership

  1. Placeholder

    Recent Cases

    Supreme Court hands down judgment in LA Micro Group Inc v LA Micro Group (UK) Ltd and others [2024]

    Company law, Commercial disputes, Trusts, probate and estates: contentious

    Clare Stanley KC
    Wednesday 11 December 2024

    View more
  2. Placeholder

    Articles

    Marcus v Marcus: can a non-biological child be ‘a child of the settlor’?

    Article by Elizabeth Houghton, 4th December 2024 To read or download this article as a PDF, please click here. In the recent judgment of Marcus v Marcus [2024] EWHC 2086, Master Marsh found that the words “the children and remoter issue of... Read more

    By Elizabeth Houghton
    Wednesday 4 December 2024

    View more
  3. Placeholder

    Recent Cases

    Blower v GH Canfields – claimant fails to establish case on negligence or causation

    Professional liability, Insolvency, Trusts, probate and estates: contentious

    Jonathan Seitler KC | Lemuel Lucan-Wilson
    Tuesday 5 November 2024

    View more
  4. Placeholder

    Articles

    Testamentary capacity: warning signs and professional best practice

    Article by Simon Atkinson, 30th September 2024 To read or download this article as a PDF, please click here. The recent decision of Joanna Smith J in Leonard v Leonard [2024] EWHC 321 (Ch) is instructive for private client practitioners, non-contentious and... Read more

    By Simon Atkinson
    Monday 30 September 2024

    View more

View all thought leadership

Upcoming events View all events

  1. Placeholder

    Events / Webinars

    Wilberforce Trusts Litigation Day 2025

    Monday 20th January 2025 | 9am - 6pm, followed by drinks and dinner
    InterContinental Park Lane, London

    £299 - £360 + VAT | 5.5 CPD CPD

    View more
  2. Placeholder

    External Conferences

    Citywealth Forum 2025

    Tuesday 13th May 2025

    Speakers:
    Gilead Cooper KC

    View more

View all events

Past events View all past events

  1. Placeholder

    External Conferences

    ThoughtLeaders4 HNW Divorce Litigation Conference – 4th Annual Flagship Conference 2024

    Thursday 21 November 2024
    One Whitehall Place, London

    Speakers:
    Jonathan Hilliard KC

    View more
  2. Placeholder

    Events / Webinars

    Wilberforce Civil Fraud Conference 2024

    Wednesday 6th November 2024 | 12.30pm - 5.55pm, followed by drinks and canapés
    The Westin London City

    £145 + VAT | 3.75 CPD

    View more
  3. Placeholder

    Events / Webinars

    Wilberforce Jersey Conference 2024

    Thursday 26th September 2024 | 3.30pm - 6.20pm, followed by a drinks reception
    Radisson Blu Waterfront Hotel, Jersey

    Free to attend | 2.0 CPD

    View more
  4. Placeholder

    Events / Webinars

    Wilberforce Guernsey Conference 2024

    Wednesday 25th September 2024 | 3.30pm - 6.20pm, followed by a drinks reception
    The Old Government House Hotel & Spa, St Peter Port

    Free to attend | 2.0 CPD

    View more

View all past events

Related Barristers