This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Search
1612 search results.
Read moreNews
Akita Holdings Ltd v Attorney General – the final curtain
Following his success before the Privy Council early last year in Akita Holdings Ltd v AG for Turks & Caicos Islands [2017] AC 590 David Phillips QC returned to the Turks & Caicos Islands’ Supreme Court for the taking of... Read more
Read moreExternal Conferences
Transcontinental Trusts: Geneva Forum 2018
- Read more
External Conferences
Transcontinental Trusts: International Forum 2018
- Read more
External Conferences
Transcontinental Trusts: International Forum 2018
Read morePublications
The Independent Bar
The Independent Bar: Insights into a Unique Business Model has now been released and features an opening chapter on strategy and why it is important, written by our Practice Director Nicholas Luckman. A useful resource for clerks, chief executives and staff... Read more
- Read more
External Conferences
South East Regional ACTAPS event
Read moreNews
Who’s Who Legal, 2018
Wilberforce Chambers features prominently in the latest edition of Who’s Who Legal, including numerous directory listings across our core practice areas and six individuals awarded the top accolade of ‘most highly regarded’. Members are recommended in the practice areas below... Read more
Read moreRecent Cases
JSC BM Bank v Vladimir Abramovich Kekhman and others
Judgment was recently handed down in a lengthy fraud trial brought by a subsidiary of VTB Bank. The claims under Russian Law made against Russian businessman Vladimir Abramovich Kekhman included deceit and unlawful dissipation of assets. Alan Gourgey QC acted successfully... Read more
Read moreRecent Cases
Rotrust Nominees Ltd v Hautford Ltd
This case confirms that there is no general proposition that a landlord will be entitled to refuse consent to assign, or alter, or change the planning use of the demised premises on grounds of feared enfranchisement and the consequent loss... Read more
Read moreNews
Court of Appeal confirms refusal of consent to application for change of planning use was unreasonable
The case of Rotrust Nominees Ltd v Hautford Ltd confirms that there is no general proposition that a landlord will be entitled to refuse consent to assign, or alter, or change the planning use of the demised premises on grounds... Read more