This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Search
1612 search results.
Read moreArticles
RPI/CPI – A little bit of good news for employers?
Read moreNews
RPI/CPI – A little bit of good news for employers?
Commentary by Paul Newman QC When the index used to calculate statutory increases to pensions in payment and the revaluation of deferred pensions was changed from RPI to CPI in 2011, the Government declined to require CPI to be applied... Read more
Read moreArticles
Valuing property in accordance with contract (Great Dunmow Estates Ltd v Crest Nicholson Operations Ltd)
Read moreNews
Great Dunmow Estates Limited v Crest Nicholson Operations Ltd & Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 1683
The Court of Appeal has, in Great Dunmow Estates Limited v Crest Nicholson Operations Ltd & Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 1683: (1) held that matters ‘agreed’ in the course of the expert determination could not have contractual effect where the... Read more
- Read more
Recent Cases
Great Dunmow Estates Limited v Crest Nicholson Operations Ltd & Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 1683
The Court of Appeal has, in Great Dunmow Estates Limited v Crest Nicholson Operations Ltd & Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 1683: (1) held that matters ‘agreed’ in the course of the expert determination could not have contractual effect where the... Read more
Read moreArticles
Deposits in conveyancing transactions: How does the penalties doctrine apply?
Read moreNews
Deposits in conveyancing transactions: How does the penalties doctrine apply?
Commentary by Joseph Steadman Anyone who has been involved in a conveyancing transaction – and many people who haven’t – will know that it is customary to pay a 10% deposit on exchange of contracts. In fact, most of those... Read more
Read moreNews
Sequent Nominees Ltd v Hautford Ltd [2019] UKSC 47
Supreme Court by majority of 3 to 2 reverses unanimous Court of Appeal decision in Sequent Nominees Ltd v Hautford Ltd and holds that a landlord’s refusal of consent to an application for change of planning use was reasonable. This... Read more
- Read more
Recent Cases
Sequent Nominees Ltd v Hautford Ltd [2019] UKSC 47
Supreme Court by majority of 3 to 2 reverses unanimous Court of Appeal decision in Sequent Nominees Ltd v Hautford Ltd and holds that a landlord’s refusal of consent to an application for change of planning use was reasonable. This... Read more
Read moreEvents / Webinars
Property “Hot Topic” Seminar: Sequent Nominees Ltd v Hautford Ltd
On Wednesday 30 October 2019 the Supreme Court handed down its much-awaited judgment in Hautford, reversing by a majority of 3 to 2 the unanimous decision of the Court of Appeal, and holding that a landlord reasonably withheld consent to its... Read more